Skip to content
Menu
Blythe Adamson, PhD, MPH
  • Infectious Economics LLC
  • Publications
    • Manuscripts
    • Abstracts
    • Other Articles
    • Speaking
  • Courses
    • Short Course
    • Methods
    • Research
    • Resources
  • Media
    • Press
    • Speaking
  • About
Blythe Adamson, PhD, MPH
May 26, 2018November 4, 2018

Progress in viral suppression shifts distribution of metrics in US states

While preparing a review for the journal Current HIV/AIDS Reports, I uncovered some interesting longitudinal trends in the care cascade and heterogeneity in the progress of US states. The following visualizations describe CDC HIV surveillance data from 2010-2014. They didn’t make the cut for our review paper, and they are too beautiful and interesting to go to waste. I invite you to pull out your Sherlock Holmes monocle, examine this evidence, and then stare out a window to think.

Good

The first version of a figure intended to represent how HIV viral suppression has improved in the United States over time. Each histogram represents the number of US states reporting the corresponding fraction of diagnosed HIV patients who are virally suppressed. Data source: CDC AtlasPlus.

This figure is pretty simple to generate by stratifying a histogram by year. The colors are a little excessive because they don’t provide any additional information that is not already labeled. To me, this was still missing a compelling trigger to my brain to show clearly how the mean is shifting from left to right over time. I wanted to see all of the distributions stacked on top of each other to better show this.

ggplot(d[d$Year >=2010 & d$Year <2015,], aes(vl, fill = yr)) +
  geom_histogram(colour = "black") +
  facet_grid(yr ~ .)  +
  xlab("Viral Suppression %") +
  xlim(0,100) +
  ggtitle("Viral Suppression (%) in US States") +
  theme_classic()

Better

After tons of messing around, I finally landed on a visualization of how I imagine the distribution to be shifting shifting over time.

The second version of a figure intending to communicate how viral suppression within US states is improving over time. Not all states are doing great. On average, we see progress.
brewer.pal(n = 5, name = "BrBG") # pick a nice color for each year
# "#A6611A" "#DFC27D" "#F5F5F5" "#80CDC1" "#018571"

ggplot(d[d$Year >=2010 & d$Year <2015,], aes(vl, fill = yr)) +
scale_fill_brewer(palette = "BrBG") +
geom_density(alpha = 0.5) +
xlab("Viral Suppression (%) in US States") +
xlim(0,100) +
geom_vline(xintercept = mean(d$vl[d$Year == 2010], na.rm = TRUE), color = "#A6611A", linetype = "dashed", size = 1) + 
geom_vline(xintercept = mean(d$vl[d$Year == 2011], na.rm = TRUE), color = "#DFC27D", linetype = "dashed", size = 1) + 
geom_vline(xintercept = mean(d$vl[d$Year == 2012], na.rm = TRUE), color = "#F5F5F5", linetype = "dashed", size = 1) + 
geom_vline(xintercept = mean(d$vl[d$Year == 2013], na.rm = TRUE), color = "#80CDC1", linetype = "dashed", size = 1) + 
geom_vline(xintercept = mean(d$vl[d$Year == 2014], na.rm = TRUE), color = "#018571", linetype = "dashed", size = 1) + 
labs(fill = "Year") +
theme_classic() +
theme(text = element_text(size=20))

Policy Impact

Let’s consider how longitudinal trends within the HIV care continuum could have important policy implications.

HIV Care Continuum, Overall, U.S., 2014 Of the estimated 1.1 million Americans living with diagnosed or undiagnosed HIV infection, 85 percent are diagnosed and about half of all Americans living with HIV are successfully controlling the virus through treatment. Source: CDC

Each bar in the HIV care continuum figure above represents a static cross-sectional moment in time. I invite you to imagine replacing the static fraction of each bar with a dynamically shifting distribution of heterogenous US states that is changing over time. The rates of mean change represents progress towards goals in our National Strategy.

For Your Reflection Time

Which states have made the biggest progress toward goals in our National Strategic Plan since 2010? Why are some states improving faster than others? Is there a statistically significant difference in the rate of progress between states with Medicaid expansion versus states without? Which states are farthest from reaching national goals and why? 

Data Source

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NCHHSTP AtlasPlus. Updated 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/atlas/index.htm. Accessed on 18 April 2018.

 

UPDATE: May 30, 2018

#dataviz fans on twitter have requested a version with dashed lines representing the median instead of mean viral suppression across US states. Check out this new version: 

Figure version 3.0 has dashed lines representing median, instead of mean, viral suppression across US states.

 

SaveSave

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Posts & Pages

  • The Last of Us Epidemiologists:  Fungal Zombies, Public Health, and the Fight to Survive
    The Last of Us Epidemiologists: Fungal Zombies, Public Health, and the Fight to Survive
  • Tools for Reproducible Real-World Data Analysis
    Tools for Reproducible Real-World Data Analysis
  • Fall 2020 Scientific Speaking
    Fall 2020 Scientific Speaking
  • Propensity Scores
    Propensity Scores
  • CHEAT SHEET: Cancer Immunotherapy
    CHEAT SHEET: Cancer Immunotherapy
My Tweets
Twitter

Top Posts & Pages

  • The Last of Us Epidemiologists:  Fungal Zombies, Public Health, and the Fight to Survive
    The Last of Us Epidemiologists: Fungal Zombies, Public Health, and the Fight to Survive
  • Tools for Reproducible Real-World Data Analysis
    Tools for Reproducible Real-World Data Analysis
  • Fall 2020 Scientific Speaking
    Fall 2020 Scientific Speaking
  • Propensity Scores
    Propensity Scores
  • CHEAT SHEET: Cancer Immunotherapy
    CHEAT SHEET: Cancer Immunotherapy
My Tweets
©2025 Blythe Adamson, PhD, MPH | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!
 

Loading Comments...